Sustainable fashion expert

Swap in the City: inspired by ReTuna to lead the secondhand mall movement in Australia by Nina Gbor

Similar to Sweden’s ReTuna being the world’s first shopping mall specifically dedicated to selling secondhand, repurposed or recycled items, Swap in the City clothes swap hub & boutique is the leading the secondhand mall movement in Australia as the country’s first preloved store in a conventional shopping mall. 

The secondhand shopping mall concept focuses on encouraging sustainable consumption, reducing waste and promoting a circular economy. ReTuna has pioneered environmentally-conscious retail with this unique shopping experience. Over 50 jobs have been created in the local economy which include skilled repair work, furniture restoration, textile renovation, creative upcycling as well as retail roles. The secondhand shopping mall essentially built an entire employment sector around waste reduction. 

ReTuna is described as a stylish, yet socially meaningful space. It has reframed the modern retail shopping experience as a low-waste circular system with electronics, bikes, clothes, furniture, toys, antiques being reused, repaired, redesigned and resold. There's even a store for vintage ikea stuff. 

Swap in the City is an innovation of Nina Gbor, founder of Eco Styles. Its model is predicated in the second pillar of the circular economy: reusing materials at their highest value. People bring clothes and accessories that fall under the categories of affordable luxury and luxury to exchange for other people’s preloved items. No fast fashion allowed. It helps reduce the fast fashion overconsumption habit and encourages people to think about their clothing overconsumption patterns.  

Waste and landfill dynamics in Australia 

Australia is one of the biggest consumers of clothing in the world per capita, the second biggest consumer of single-use plastics in the world and a country that sends nearly 76 million tonnes of waste to landfill each year. Beyond diverting materials from landfill, and operating in circularity, secondhand malls provide relief in an era where the cost-of-living crisis is prevalent.    

At the time of writing this, nearly every house on the street I live on in Sydney has household items like electronics, kitchenware, furniture, toys, etc sitting on the sidewalk in front of their house, awaiting pick up by the local government council. This occurs about 2 - 4 times a year. Australian local councils spend an estimated average of $5 million to $15 million each year specifically on landfill fees and state-imposed waste levies. Larger metropolitan councils in Australia can face annual landfill bills exceeding AUD $20 million to AUD $30 million, while mid-sized regional cities (like Mildura) report paying around AUD $8 million annually. Greater Sydney and some areas in Victoria State, the state of Queensland and Perth have less than five years left of landfill space or otherwise tight landfill constraints

The Secondhand and sustainably-made shopping future 

Innovations such as ReTuna and Swap in the City should not be a mere trend or a movement. They could be the way we acquire and consume items moving forward. The TRENDmill method where we have normalised raw material extraction often to make products under a planned obsolescence system that end up in landfill in a relatively short time very likely cannot continue forever. The environmental destruction and biodiversity loss can be irreversible. It has also contributed to enormous global social inequality. Getting off this TRENDmill through systemised, mainstream reuse and reducing the amount of raw materials extracted from the earth to make new products. This could be a strategy for planetary regeneration and conservation and regeneration and pathway to a healthier, more equitable planet. 

Greenwood Plaza in North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia where Swap in the City is located has other circular economy stores. Under one roof Greenwood Plaza mall (owned by Mirvac) has Unwanted FC (upcycling sports garments), Joy of Giving (Toy Swap & toy waste education), The Greenwood Drop (secondhand clothing sales), a computer & phone repair store, shoe and clothing repair & alteration stores. While it is not as robust as ReTuna, the mall has created an excellent centre for circular shopping and activities. It’s a testament that malls across the world can follow ReTuna’s example in creating their own version of local, circular malls that create jobs and boost the local economy in circular and sustainable ways. 

*Learn more or visit Swap in the City here.

The EU’s Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) law that may force the fashion industry to become more sustainable by Nina Gbor

EU fashion EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility) Australia fashion legislation fashion law 1

Image credit: Fernand De Canne

The European Union has struck textile companies with intensive laws dedicated to reducing the impact of fast fashion on the planet. The union has been at the forefront of rooting out the exploitative business practices of fast fashion giants such as Shein, H&M, and Inditex Group (which includes companies like Berksha, Zara, and Massimo Dutti). The EU is implementing laws that will reduce textile waste and promote recycling of fashion items. 

According to The Fashion Law, the EU has introduced an “Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)” mandate on 9 September 2025 for textile producers, which ensures that fast fashion companies shoulder the responsibility of “collecting, sorting, and recycling the clothing and household textiles” instead of individual consumers. The EPR is an addition to the existing Waste Framework Directive which calls for the development of sustainable waste management practices. Fortunately, these rules are also applicable to traditional European labels, promoting sustainability in the textile industry regardless of their business model. The EU is adamant about each member state adopting the necessary technology and infrastructure and setting protracted policy goals for the future. 

In the Waste Framework Directive, the EU highlights the complex composition of municipal waste which makes efficient sorting and recycling difficult for existing waste management infrastructures. The active participation of citizens is also a major factor in waste management to ensure each category of waste is discarded and recycled correctly. The Waste Framework Directive also stated that in order to combat the level of municipal waste in the world, a sophisticated system and public awareness is necessary. However, EPR rightfully places the responsibility of recycling on one of the world’s largest polluters themselves, forcing these companies to comply with sustainable business practices moving forward. 

If fast fashion companies continue to operate within the non-stop, trend-focused business model, the fashion industry is projected to generate 26% of the world’s carbon emissions by 2050. The only beneficiaries of this horrible statistic are the companies that earn billions of dollars from exploiting human labor and destroying the planet. This huge achievement toward legislative change in fashion serves as a framework for the rest of the world to reject unnecessary textile waste. However, the issue has not been abolished completely. Unless the rest of the world creates similar programs for its fashion markets, fast fashion giants will continue to switch their marketing practices and entice you to buy that new shirt for your “first” events forever. 

Australia is a leading consumer of fast fashion, ahead of many EU nations and the US. In a 2024 research paper by Nina Gbor and Olivia Chollet from the Australia Institute emphasized that the sheer quantity of Australian textile waste is 200,000 tonnes, equivalent to a weight of four Sydney Harbor Bridges. The Australian government needs to establish concrete laws similar to the EU to curb its textile waste crisis. Nina Gbor, founder of Eco Styles, has launched a petition to revive the Australian textile industry with a focus on circular economy practices. Here is a brief summary of some of the policies this petition is advocating for: 

  •  Reviving the Australian textile industry, which can help create a $38 billion industry for onshore production jobs for women 

  • Significant industry reform under the Labor Government’s Progressive productivity agenda and its commitment to the net-zero agenda by 2050 as well as strengthen the economic resilience of the country

  • Taxing ultra fast-fashion brands and investing the returns into the Australian fashion industry 

  • Phasing out virgin plastics and synthetic materials as well as banning toxic chemicals in line with the Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals foundation

  • Public awareness about the health and environmental complications of buying fast fashion items

  • Pushing for ethical business and fair trade practices under the Modern Slavery Act of 2018 to ensure there are no human rights violations within the industry. 

Sign the petition to create impactful change in legislation and consumer behavior in Australia. Self-expression through fashion should not have such a heavy cost. When you buy your next piece of clothing, think about the social and environmental impact of the item you are purchasing. Prioritize brands practice sustainability, quality, and fair trade. Opt for methods such as thrifting, mending, repairing, and swapping to elongate the lifecycle of clothing items and prevent their early demise into landfills already brimming to their maximum capacity. 


Article by Samya Dawadi for Eco Styles. Samya’s focus is on environmental and sustainability consulting in business and art.